Idiotic Parents & Political Pandering: The “Vaccine-Autism Link”
May 15, 2008 in attachment parenting, autism, pseudoscience
DAY 80. Fellow survivors found: 2
Once again, human stupidity proves to know no partisan boundaries…
“It’s indisputable that (autism) is on the rise among children, the question is what’s causing it. And we go back and forth and there’s strong evidence that indicates it’s got to do with a preservative in vaccines.”
- John McCain, Texas town hall meeting, February 29, 2008
“I am committed to make investments to find the causes of autism, including possible environmental causes like vaccines.”
- Hillary Clinton, campaign answer to a questionnaire from the group A-Champ, March 14, 2008
“We’ve seen just a skyrocketing autism rate. Some people are suspicious that it’s connected to the vaccines. This person included. The science right now is inconclusive, but we have to research it.”
- Barack Obama, Pennsylvania Rally, April 21, 2008
To be fair to our Presidential candidates, ’tis not so much pure stupidity as political pandering. The “vaccine-autism link” has become a rather hot button issue (and while I’m necessarily disturbed, if not surprised, by such abject ignorance permeating the masses, it does converge with my current work on AT/P in an oddly pleasing way).
Well, this is old news for many, but for all the attachment parenting freaks, fundie wingnuts and future leaders of the Free World out there…
I regret to inform you that the “vaccine-autism link” has been thoroughly debunked as utter codswallop.
For those who don’t know, thimerosal, a mercury-containing organic compound, was used in vaccines as a preservative and has been identified as the culprit for causing autism. It’s not the vaccines in and of themselves so much as the particular ingredient within them that get these parents all frothy at the mouth.
(Now, some of you may be thinking to yourself, “well, why aren’t people just anti-MERCURY as opposed to anti-vaccine?” To which I’d respond by requesting you to kindly take your infernal powers of logic and reason elsewhere. You have no place in this world. Vile heretics, the lot of you.)
So. Thimerosal was duly removed from children’s vaccines, and there was much rejoicing.
It’s been almost a decade now. Thimerosal is gone; autism rates are still climbing, “skyrocketing” even, more so than when thimerosal was present.
So, scientists conducted studies and determined that there exists no correlation whatsoever between mercury exposure and autism in children.
Vile heretics, the lot of them.
“Through its Vaccine Safety tracking system, the CDC has examined the incidence of autism as a function of the amount of thimerosal a child received from vaccines. The results of these and other reviews conclusively show that there’s absolutely no causal link between autism rates and the amount of thimerosal children received.” Source
Oh, and that British bloke who pretty much engendered the this whole “kiddie vaccines cause autism!” hullabaloo…you know, Dr. Andrew Wakefield? He’s now on trial for ethics violations and serious professional misconduct, as are his colleagues. Charges include baldfaced lying and proffering money at birthday parties for the blood of children.
Sweet.
Now, before any attachment parents out there get all frothy, allow me to point out that vaccines can entail risks, namely allergic reactions.
But unless you’re monumentally stupid, you should be able to acknowledge by now that vaccines do not cause autism.
Also, given the choice between a three-day rash versus exposure to communicable, potentially fatal and debilitating diseases?
Well, it’s not really a choice, is it.
Unless, of course, you actually want polio to make its way back to the Western hemisphere. Over 3,000 dead and 20,000 paralyzed within a single year. That could be fun.
Seriously, the only reason you might be able to get away with refusing to inoculate your kids is because you are riding on the backs of the immunized population, which must remain the majority in order to prevent outbreaks and epidemics.
….So, basically it’s OK that the vast majority of children are exposed to the so-called risks and imagined horrors of vaccines, so long as your own children are safe?
Christ, you people are selfish. Either that or stupid. Not sure which, the two aren’t mutually exclusive.
I don’t put much stock in cognitivism, but I do like that Emerson quote, “the ancestor of every action is a thought.”
If there’s only one truth I’ve garnered from my experiences with AT/P, it’s that stupidity has dire consequences in physical reality. This next piece of news is the main reason why I wrote this post in the first place:
“Measles, which once killed 500 American children a year, is making a comeback–and some New York lawmakers are eager to help the disease prosper.
The Centers for Disease Control reports a surge in measles outbreaks; almost all the cases are in children who never received the routine shots for measles, mumps and rubella (MMR). Vanquished diseases are rebounding thanks to growing–but groundless–fears over the safety of traditional vaccines. Driven by those fears, ever more parents are finding a way to forgo shots for their children–even though shots are required in most of the nation. And some politicians are encouraging them. A proposed New York law, sponsored by Suffolk County Assemblyman Marc Alessi, would establish a ‘philosophical’ exemption to mandatory childhood vaccinations.
…Worldwide, measles kills about 242,000 children a year.
Source: Scott Gottlieb, M.D. The American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research
Looks like your kids aren’t safe after all.
Further reading:
MMR scare doctor ‘paid children’
‘No link’ between MMR and autism
Study backs safety of MMR vaccine
Doctors issue plea over MMR jab
Top doctor wades into MMR debate
MMR doctor to face ‘GMC’ charges
- "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive...those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."
- C.S. LEWIS
Q: What is attachment therapy?
A: Attachment therapy (widely known as "holding therapy," "rage-reduction" or "dyadic developmental therapy") is a torturous and entirely unscientific practice that preys on orphaned adoptees, foster kids and children who already have a history of abuse.
Attachment therapy techniques rely on forceful physical coercion and restraint, non-consensual touching, verbal abuse, intimidation, humiliation, enforced eye contact and punishments related to food, water and air intake. It is rejected by the mainstream psychiatric community as "harmful pseudoscience," yet the practice continues to this day in the US and other countries around the world.
IN MEMORIAM: The child casualties of Attachment Therapy/RAD parenting to date.
WATCH LIST: Public listing of every Attachment Therapist in the US, UK and Canada.
HOW TO MAKE A COMPLAINT AGAINST AT PRACTITIONERS: Comprehensive guidelines for survivors on obtaining justice.
DARKNESS VISIBLE: Personal account of sessions in AT. Warning: graphic details. Archives
-
-
Recent Posts
- Attachment Therapist Heather Forbes tries to twist the repeated stabbings of adopted children Hannah & Linnea Sieferman into personal publicity campaign
- National Autism Awareness Month
- Philip Zimbardo: How ordinary people become monsters…or heroes
- Ronald Federici; The Egregious Emperor of Child Endangerment
- “Inside Guantanamo” by National Geographic
- Ron Federici & Arthur Becker-Weidman are now Trying to Smear Attachment Therapy Survivors through Impersonation
- 8 Things I Meant to Say 400 Days Ago
- Children’s Song by R.S. Thomas
- Smear Campaign: You’re Doing It Wrong, AKA Attachment Therapists try to use Scientology to Further Harass ACT
- The Alexis Glover Murder: Yet Another Pseudoscientific “Attachment Disorder” Diagnosis and Attachment Therapy Case
- How to Make a Complaint against Attachment Therapists and “Therapeutic Foster Parents”
- The Year of Bastardly Thinking
- A Letter from the “Emperor” himself: Mister Ronald Federici Threatens Survivors of Attachment Therapy
- In Memoriam: Faith Finley
- The Murder of 13-year-old Alexis Glover: “My mom is going to kill me…nobody believes what I say…”
Resources
- Advocates for Children in Therapy
- APSAC Task Force Report on Attachment Therapy (Feb. 2006)
- ChildRightsCampaign.org
- Coalition Against Institutionalized Child Abuse
- Fight Institutional Child Abuse Network
- ISAC (International Survivors Action Committee)
- JSTOR.org: Attachment Theory
- Kids Come First
- PPL: Advocates for Adoptees and Children in Foster Care
- QuackWatch.com
- Secret Prisons for Teens
- Stop the Rod
- Teen Advocates USA
- TeenLiberty.org
- The Etiology of a Social Epidemic
- The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice
- Please do not hesitate to contact me: waywardradish@gmail.com
Also, feel free to contact Linda Rosa, executive director of ACT:
linda.and.rosa@gmail.com
CALENDAR
Tags
adoption arthur becker-weidman attachment parenting autism Candace Newmaker censorship child boot camps citizen media Conrad Boeding education fatalities following the money foster childhood heather forbes legal justice memory pharmacracy politics pseudoscience PTSD race matters reactive attachment disorder religion ronald federici sociopathy survivors torture tapes-
Blog Stats
- 78,804 hits

May 16, 2008 at 9:36 am
Would be interested in seeing your opinion of the causes, particularly the scientists involved.
May 16, 2008 at 6:11 pm
Science is only un-biased when the funding is unbiased and the studies I’ve seen are honestly not convincing. Most flu vaccines still contain thimerosol, as do boosters for DT, TT for ages 7+. Rhogham isn’t a vaccine, but it’s in that shot, too. Many of the other carcinogenic and nuerotoxic ingredients are also harmful. Any toxin injected into a developing body with an immature system can greatly do much harm, so how in the world can vaccines NOT be one of the possible causes, especially if you tie in genetics and a toxic environment? I would agree that this isn’t black or white and much more study should be done . . . which means you CANNOT discount vaccines playing some role in some kids. It is way past time to start questioning the validity of a one-size-fits-all schedule involving millions of children with wildly varying allergies and susceptabilities.
Only now the CDC is barely aknowledging that more study should be done, even though they’ve come out with their own funded studies supposedly disproving the notion.
May 21, 2008 at 3:00 am
have not done the scientific work on this, but the link for vaccines seems specious at best. anecdotally, i have heard news reports about people trying to claim a connection. forget about the fact that they were on fertility drugs and/or had in vitro fertilization or a whole host of other combos of unnatural conception. yeah, let’s not look at that stuff, right? must be the vaccines that people have been getting for generations, with the only difference being that now they are less toxic than ever. hmmm…
October 24, 2008 at 7:06 pm
I am skeptical of the idea that vaccinations have anything to do with autism, but I do not rule the idea out entirely. For that reason, I would suggest everyone give their child all the vaccines they need, but in most cases, it would be best to wait until age 3.
I think the aggressive schedule the CDC is only suited for when there is an out break.
Ironically, the more unvaccinated kids your child has contact with, the more nervous I would be in waiting to vaccinate.
October 24, 2008 at 7:38 pm
I would suggest everyone give their child all the vaccines they need, but in most cases, it would be best to wait until age 3.
…Which is when autism generally begins to manifest, thus this only fuels feeble minds that are suckered into believing this benighted pseudoscience.
I think the aggressive schedule the CDC is only suited for when there is an out break.
You, sir, are an idiot.
Ironically, the more unvaccinated kids your child has contact with, the more nervous I would be in waiting to vaccinate.
The only irony in your statement is entirely unwitting.
February 10, 2009 at 1:54 am
I wonder if there will be studies to look at the possibility of a correlation between children conceived through in vitro fertilization and autism. Perhaps with the manipulation of the egg, sperm and embryo, changes that have so far been unseen occur which increase the likelihood of autism.